On this session of UC At the moment, host Kristian McCann sits down with Simon Peters, Director of Channel Gross sales at Smarsh, to unpack one of the crucial urgent questions going through regulated industries in 2026: Is your compliance resolution actually safe — and is its AI even compliant?
It’s a wake-up name for compliance, threat, and IT leaders who assume ticking the compliance field equals hermetic information safety. As international fines for compliance and information breaches proceed to climb — together with over $63 million in penalties in early 2025 alone — this dialog exposes the 2 blind spots most organizations nonetheless overlook.
Peters explains how compliance and safety aren’t interchangeable, why third-party AI fashions can create new compliance gaps, and the way Smarsh has constructed “compliant AI by structure” — protecting all information, transcripts, and evaluation inside prospects’ personal sovereign environments.
Key dialogue factors embrace:
Why compliance ≠ safety — and the way most instruments go away key information unprotected
The hidden AI compliance hole: when “good” programs leak delicate information externally
How Smarsh’s regional AI structure ensures zero information leakage and full audit readiness
The true-world penalties of breaches — from SEC fines to reputational harm
Subsequent steps:
Go to Smarsh.com to obtain the “Compliance Should-Haves” guidelines and the Seven Hidden Voice Knowledge Dangers information.
Associated Tales:
