Workflow automation redesign is the step most enterprises skip. They establish a handbook course of, construct an automation layer, and declare success when cycle time drops. However the workflow nonetheless exists. The approvals nonetheless exist. The handoffs nonetheless exist. The exceptions nonetheless exist. In lots of instances, the organisation finally ends up sustaining the previous course of and the brand new automation on the similar time.
For UC As we speak readers, this issues as a result of the fashionable workflow lives throughout communications surfaces. E-mail threads, Groups chats, assembly follow-ups, ticket queues, doc feedback, and approvals. If automation doesn’t take away the necessity for these coordination loops, it is going to merely transfer them round sooner.
‘The objective is to not automate steps. The objective is to delete the necessity for the steps.’
For this reason course of elimination technique is the highest-leverage mindset shift for Heads of Automation and Enterprise Architects. It reframes the query from ‘how can we automate this workflow’ to ‘why does this workflow exist in any respect’. If you reply that actually, many workflows may be eliminated totally by way of redesign, standardisation, and smarter system boundaries.
Associated Articles
How can automation get rid of total workflows?
Direct reply: Automation eliminates total workflows whenever you redesign the working mannequin so the work now not requires handoffs, approvals, or handbook coordination within the first place.
Elimination normally occurs by way of certainly one of 5 strikes:
Take away the set off: cease creating the request that begins the workflow.
Change the choice mannequin: exchange approvals with coverage and pre-authorised thresholds.
Standardise inputs: get rid of back-and-forth by imposing structured consumption and defaults.
Push work to the sting: let the system or person full the motion on the level of want.
Collapse methods: take away duplicate methods of file so reconciliation work disappears.
In different phrases, the structure adjustments. The workflow disappears as a result of the necessity for it disappears. That’s the essence of enterprise automation design that produces significant effectivity positive aspects.
What processes shouldn’t be automated?
Direct reply: Don’t automate workflows that exist solely to compensate for unclear possession, poor knowledge high quality, duplicated methods, or damaged governance.
If a workflow exists as a result of groups don’t belief the info, automating it merely accelerates mistrust. If it exists as a result of no person owns the choice, automation will create extra escalations. If it exists as a result of two methods each declare to be the supply of fact, automation will produce sooner reconciliation, not fewer reconciliations.
A fast take a look at: if the workflow disappeared tomorrow, would the enterprise nonetheless perform, or would it not solely expose a deeper design downside? If it will solely expose a design downside, repair the design first.
How do main organisations redesign workflows earlier than automation?
Direct reply: Main organisations redesign workflows by mapping the workstream finish to finish, eradicating non-value steps, then automating solely the simplified model.
That is the place workflow simplification turns into a proper self-discipline. The strongest programmes run a sequence that appears like this:
Outline the end result: what does ‘achieved’ imply, and who owns it?
Map the workstream: embody channels, methods, approvals, and exceptions.
Delete steps: take away something that exists just for visibility, reassurance, or legacy coverage.
Change approvals with coverage: set thresholds and guardrails, then let the system resolve.
Standardise the consumption: structured knowledge reduces clarification loops.
Automate the brand new movement: now construct automation, with logs, audit, and exception dealing with.
Measure outcomes: time-to-decision, time-to-completion, exception price, rework.
Discover what this prevents. It prevents constructing automation round chaos. It prevents ‘sooner noise’. It additionally prevents the commonest failure mode: automating a nasty course of so successfully that you just scale the dangerous course of.
ServiceNow makes an identical level in its platform positioning by treating automation as an end-to-end system of motion relatively than a set of remoted bots. The excellence issues. Workflow elimination requires orchestration, governance, and a transparent system boundary the place work is owned and accomplished.
“The objective is to maneuver from fragmented work to a single system of motion that connects folks, processes, and knowledge.”
The place does automation speed up inefficiency?
Direct reply: Automation accelerates inefficiency when it will increase throughput in a workflow that also will depend on gradual choices, unclear possession, and handbook exception dealing with.
You see this in 4 patterns:
Extra tickets, similar decision: consumption turns into simpler, backlog grows.
Extra notifications, similar readability: alerts enhance, choices don’t enhance.
Extra duties, similar possession: duties are created mechanically, then recycled throughout groups.
Extra velocity, extra rework: work strikes sooner, however errors and exceptions rise.
These patterns should not random. They occur when automation targets the seen work (routing, producing, notifying) relatively than the limiting work (deciding, prioritising, resolving). If you don’t redesign the choice layer, you’ll velocity up the improper factor.
What defines true operational simplification?
Direct reply: True simplification reduces the variety of handoffs, choices, and coordination loops required to finish an consequence.
The metrics that matter should not ‘workflows triggered’ or ‘duties created’. They’re the metrics that present work disappearing:
Fewer steps per consequence: the method is shorter, not simply sooner.
Fewer touchpoints: fewer people required to finish the work.
Decrease exception price: the workflow resolves extra instances with out escalation.
Decrease coordination load: fewer follow-ups in electronic mail, chat, and conferences.
Decrease rework: fewer loops, fewer revisions, fewer approvals.
If you see these indicators, you’re now not optimising a workflow. You’re decreasing operational complexity. That’s the distinction between ‘automation as acceleration’ and operational effectivity automation that truly adjustments outcomes.
For Heads of Automation and Enterprise Architects, the mandate is evident. Cease treating automation as a layer you add. Deal with it as a simplification technique. Redesign first. Delete what you may. Then automate what stays, with governance and measurement that show actual consequence positive aspects.
FAQs
How can automation get rid of total workflows?
By redesigning the working mannequin so work now not requires handoffs, approvals, and handbook coordination. Workflow elimination normally requires coverage, standardisation, and clear system boundaries.
What processes shouldn’t be automated?
Workflows that exist to compensate for damaged possession, poor knowledge high quality, duplicated methods, or unclear governance. Repair the design downside first, then automate the simplified movement.
How do main organisations redesign workflows earlier than automation?
They map the workstream finish to finish, delete non-value steps, standardise consumption, exchange approvals with thresholds, then automate solely the redesigned workflow and measure outcomes.
The place does automation speed up inefficiency?
At consumption, routing, notifications, and activity creation when the actual bottleneck is decision-making, prioritisation, or exception dealing with. Automation will increase throughput however not completion.
What defines true operational simplification?
Fewer steps, fewer handoffs, decrease exception charges, decrease rework, and fewer coordination load. Simplification reveals up as work disappearing, not simply transferring sooner.
